Development of an Academic Results Verification Manual for Students of the Faculty of Education, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University

Abstract

This manual is designed to provide guidelines for examining student academic performance. The purpose of this manual is to ensure accurate and consistent assessment. The content covers the assessment process, from preparation, conducting the assessment, recording results, and finalizing the assessment. It also explains the scoring criteria and assessment methods for each course, along with case studies and related forms to help assessors apply them effectively. The study population consisted of 70 first-year students from the Faculty of Education, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, across seven disciplines. Data was collected using a satisfaction questionnaire via Google Forms. Statistics used for data analysis included percentages, means, and standard deviations.
The results of the data analysis revealed that 38 (54.3%) of the 70 respondents were female, followed by 32 (45.7%) males. The respondents were from the following disciplines: Social Studies, Thai Language, English, Mathematics, Early Childhood Education, and General Science. and in the Digital Technology for Education program, 10 students, representing 14.3% of the total. The frequency of accessing the academic performance-tracking system was found to be 2-5 times per week (28 students, 40%), less than 2 times per week (22 students, 31.4%), and more than 5 times per week (20 students, 28.6%). During the academic performance-tracking system, 35 students, 50%, used it during grade processing, 31 students, 44.3%, to submit grades, and 57 students, 81.4%, to announce academic results. The semester ended with 22 students, 31.4%, and 31.4%, respectively, receiving training on the registration system. Regarding their experiences with training on the system, 53 students, 75.7%, had previously received the training, and 17 students, 24.3%, had not received the training. The project implementation was highly successful.
Data analysis revealed that students in the Faculty of Education expressed satisfaction with the up-to-dateness of the information. Ranked #1 with a mean of 4.83 and a standard deviation of 0.3796. They were also satisfied with the easy-to-understand data display (mean of 4.81 and a standard deviation of 0.4271). They were also satisfied with the data report format (mean of 4.77 and a standard deviation of 0.4229). The system was easy and fast to access (mean of 4.71 and a standard deviation of 0.5148). Data processing speed (mean of 4.71 and a standard deviation of 0.5148). Continuity of system use (mean of 4.71 and a standard deviation of 0.5148). The error notification system (mean of 4.77 and a standard deviation of 0.4559). The system's user manual clearly explains the steps and is easy to follow (mean of 4.79 and a standard deviation of 0.4783). Convenience and channels for contacting customers (mean of 4.81 and a standard deviation of 0.4271). Proper consultation and troubleshooting (mean of 4.81 and a standard deviation of 0.4271).